Legal expert explains how criminal indictment would be “almost a death blow” to the Trump Organization

Dear Palmer Report readers, we all understand the difficult era we're heading into. Major media outlets are caving to Trump already. Even the internet itself and publishing platforms may be at risk. But Palmer Report is nonetheless going to lead the fight. We're funding our 2025 operating expenses now, so we can keep publishing no matter what happens. I'm asking you to contribute if you can, because the stakes are just so high. You can donate here.

When the New York Times reported yesterday that New York’s first round of criminal indictments in the case against Donald Trump will include an indictment against the Trump Organization, it led to a lot of discussion about what this means. After all, indicting a company is very rare.

Palmer Report firmly expects that such an indictment will merely be a warm-up act for inevitable individual indictments against the Trump Organization’s principal officers, most of whom are named “Trump.” After all, you don’t indict a company just because the CFO was doing some corrupt things with the books. You indict a company because you believe you can prove that the principal officers were all in on a criminal conspiracy.

That said, it still raises questions about what an initial criminal indictment against the Trump Organization this week would actually do. Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Goldman says that such an indictment would actually be really serious. He cautions that he’s not necessarily taking the New York Times reporting at face value. But he also adds that an indictment would quickly isolate and bankrupt the Trump Organization:

We agree with Goldman on his premise that New York isn’t going to indict the Trump Organization just because Weisselberg did some things wrong. If the Trump Organization is indicted this week, it’ll mean that prosecutors have uncovered enough systemic criminal wrongdoing to take down everyone at the top of the company.