Trump misses the target with his latest nonsense

| 10:57 pm EST February 22, 2018
Dear Palmer Report readers, we all understand the difficult era we're heading into. Major media outlets are caving to Trump already. Even the internet itself and publishing platforms may be at risk. But Palmer Report is nonetheless going to lead the fight. We're funding our 2025 operating expenses now, so we can keep publishing no matter what happens. I'm asking you to contribute if you can, because the stakes are just so high. You can donate here.

In a Wednesday meeting with seriously concerned citizens alarmed by the Parkland school massacre, Trump came up with a particularly thoughtless solution. Arm 20% of the teaching staff. Trump reasons that any armed teacher would immediately take down a heavily armed shooter. Let’s pretend for a moment that this is a serious proposal. In order to implement such a program, one must consider, among other things:

A. Equipment – who is paying for the firearms? The federal government? The local school district? The teacher?

B. Equipment – standardized weaponry-6 round Kel-Tek P3AT or 17 round Ruger SR9 Semi Auto Handguns? Federal regulation, State regulation or local school board rules?

C. Training – Federal standards? State standards? Local school board rules? Cross training with LEOs?

D. Licensure – Standard conceal carry permit? Deputization?

E. Rules of engagement—same as local peace officers?

F. Financial responsibility—personal liability or Federal “Really Good Samaritan” Law? School district liability? Local law enforcement? Bonding requirement?

G. Powers of arrest?

H. Will armed teachers receive hazardous duty pay?

I. State Workers Compensation coverage, including PTSD? If so, then actions taken to stop an attacker will arise out of and in the course of the teacher’s employment, subjecting the local school district to liability

J. Will a Federal Armed Teacher program bring a teacher under the Federal Employee Compensation Act? If so, then the teacher must be expressly exempted from §8102 (a)(2) which doesn’t cover injuries or death “caused by the employee’s intention to bring about the injury or death of … another.”

K. Funding?

There is no reason to think that this proposal will ever be debated at any level. Trump has demonstrated that shooting one’s mouth off is much easier than shooting a heavily armed attacker, with a high probability of collateral damage.