DOJ to Jim Jordan: nice try!

| 6:49 pm EST January 20, 2023
Dear Palmer Report readers, we all understand the difficult era we're heading into. Major media outlets are caving to Trump already. Even the internet itself and publishing platforms may be at risk. But Palmer Report is nonetheless going to lead the fight. We're funding our 2025 operating expenses now, so we can keep publishing no matter what happens. I'm asking you to contribute if you can, because the stakes are just so high. You can donate here.

Throughout the 2022 election cycle, there was this popular narrative that if the Republicans won the midterms, they could somehow magically shut down the DOJ’s criminal investigations into Donald Trump and other Republicans. Of course nothing works that way, and now we’re seeing how things really work.

House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan recently demanded that the DOJ turn over evidence about ongoing criminal cases. In its formal response today, the DOJ’s answer was a long winded version of “no.” The reason: the DOJ does not provide anyone with evidence in ongoing investigations.

This was the only way this was going to play out. There wasn’t going to be a different outcome, where the DOJ just decided to give House Republicans evidence in its ongoing probes for the heck of it. Nor were House Republicans going to be able to wave some magic wand that forces the DOJ to turn over such evidence. Nor can the House magically defund the DOJ. These just aren’t real things. While these kinds of threats are good for making Republicans look strong in the eyes of their deranged base, and good for helping the media hit its ratings marks, they’re still not real things.

What the House Judiciary Committee can (and will) do is hold public hearings in which they speculate, theorize, and flat out lie about what the DOJ may or may not be doing. And the committee may force the likes of Attorney General Merrick Garland to testify during those sham hearings. But when he’s asked questions about ongoing investigations into people like Trump, the only response he’ll give is a polite version of “no.”